Comparison of wildtype and PtTryp2 KO lines across different nutrient conditions: (WT / PtTryp2 KO) * (HNHP/LNHP/HNLP)
18 runs:
- Download WT_HNLP_rep1 (SRR19179281) data:
- Download WT_HNLP_rep2 (SRR19179282) data:
- Download WT_HNLP_rep3 (SRR19179283) data:
- Download WT_LNHP_rep1 (SRR19179284) data:
- Download WT_LNHP_rep2 (SRR19179285) data:
- Download WT_LNHP_rep3 (SRR19179286) data:
- Download WT_HNHP_rep1 (SRR19179287) data:
- Download WT_HNHP_rep2 (SRR19179288) data:
- Download WT_HNHP_rep3 (SRR19179289) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNLP_rep1 (SRR19179290) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNLP_rep2 (SRR19179291) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNLP_rep3 (SRR19179292) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_LNHP_rep1 (SRR19179293) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_LNHP_rep2 (SRR19179294) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_LNHP_rep3 (SRR19179295) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNHP_rep1 (SRR19179296) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNHP_rep2 (SRR19179297) data:
- Download PtTryp2_KO_HNHP_rep3 (SRR19179298) data:
7 comparisons:
Reference: You et al., 2022